In preparing, formulating and filing a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS, it is important to distinguish between laws, facts, and persuasive argumentation, as well as the targeted audience to whom such distinguishing elements are being conveyed.
For the first two “stages” of the administrative process, the Federal or Postal employee will be addressing personnel at the U.S. Office of Personnel Management. This is merely at the “administrative”, or “agency” level of the process. Thus, the initial review, analysis, and application of the legal criteria will be performed by a non-lawyer, and any application of a legal criteria to determine the eligibility of the Federal Disability Retirement application will be done in a rather mechanical manner.
By “mechanical manner” is merely meant that the criteria to be applied is merely an extrapolated generic form of interpretation, and will be applied by comparing the “list” of legal criteria against the submission of the Federal or Postal employee. Whether there is sufficient justification in the medical report and records; whether the description of the Federal or Postal employee’s job comports with the official position description; whether the agency has offered an “accommodation“, and if so, in what form; whether a reassignment to another position at the same pay or grade was offered and declined — and other applicable criteria will be applied, analyzed and annotated by the OPM Representative.
If the Federal Disability Retirement application is denied at this initial stage of the process, then it will again be reviewed at the Reconsideration Stage of the process — assuming that the Federal or Postal employee files a timely Request for Reconsideration with the Office of Personnel Management.
It is at the next stage of the administrative process — an appeal to the Merit Systems Protection Board — that any legal argument will ultimately begin to carry significant and relevant weight. For, at the MSPB, an Administrative Judge will review the entire file, and proceed to conduct an administrative hearing “de novo”, or “fresh” or “anew”, and weigh the evidence, the legal arguments, and determine the persuasive impact of either or both.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Process | Tagged: accepting opm disability clients all across america, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, civil service disability, crafting effective persuasive arguments in your opm disability retirement application, de novo process in OPM disability law, Federal Disability, federal disability law and legal argumentation, federal disability retirement, federal disability retirement application and process, FERS disability retirement, finding persuasive arguments for your opm disability application approval, legal persuasion in the initial federal disability application, meeting the legal criteria fers and csrs disability retirement, nationwide representation of federal employees, OPM disability retirement, opm medical retirement qualification ruled by legal criteria of eligibility, owcp disability retirement, persuading an opm representative to rule in your favor, persuasive argument in federal disability retirement claims, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, the appropriate factual argumentation in your specific opm disability claim, the approval process for opm disability retirement, the approval/disapproval process, the art of persuasion in fers disability retirement law, the official job description for your csrs disability file, thinking process, USPS disability retirement |
Leave a Reply