Life presents conundrums of certainties and presumptions; the former in order to retain sanity; the latter in order to appear sane. A certain event is one which is expected to occur because of a natural law, a habitual repetition of reliance, or because the daily routine has engrained it upon our consciousness. A presumption is a wish for certainty which may not even be rationally-based, but one in which we conclude will likely occur because of past events, contextual probabilities, and a sense that the present should reflect the historicity of the past.
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, it is best to establish the strict bifurcation between certainties which are clearly so, and avoid presumptions.
It is certain that Federal Disability Retirement is a process which will likely require multiple stages to obtain; it is certain that the Office of Personnel Management will scrutinize each Federal and Postal employee’s application and find it deficient or inadequate; it is certain that one’s agency will likely be two-faced and feign loyalty and support but act in ways which defy such declarative embracing of the Federal or Postal employee. Conversely, one should never presume that one’s case is a “slam-dunk”; nor that OPM will make a decision sooner than later; nor that OPM will provide a rationally-based reasoning for denying a case.
Hume and Berkeley aside, we live in a world where cause-and-effect are relied upon, and where the world does not merely depend upon our perceiving it; but certainties should always be tempered with an understanding that Federal Disability Retirement is an administrative process which must be fought for, then protected, and presuming an easy path with any Federal agency is to defy the logic which both Hume and Berkeley took to the extreme.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Pre-Application Considerations | Tagged: agency's loyalty, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, Berkeley’s philosophy, considering opm's methodology, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, david hume and fers disability retirement, experienced attorney defending disabled clients at the mspb stages, Federal Disability, federal disability application and appeal stages, federal disability retirement, federal disability retirement attorney, federal disability retirement lawyer, federal employee attorney, federal employee's loyalty towards the us government, federal government employee, federal law firm, fers, FERS disability retirement, mcgill federal, mspb appeal, mspb attorney, mspb lawyer, nationwide representation of federal employees, office of personnel management, opm appeal, opm attorney, OPM disability attorney, OPM disability lawyer, OPM disability retirement, OPM lawyer, opm reconsideration, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, representing federal employees from any us government agency, resources for injured federal workers, Robert R. McGill Federal Law Firm, several rounds or stages to get your federal opm disability benefits, the chances the opm will find your federal disability application deficient or inadequate, the different stages of the opm disability process, the loyalty of a federal agency toward its own employees, the loyalty of the us postal service toward its injured employees, the predictability in the way the opm will evaluate your federal disability application, the probability that your fers disability claim will end up in the mspb, the scrutiny of the office of personnel management, usps feign loyalty and support toward disabled postal workers, what it will be certain when you apply for federal disability benefits |
Leave a Reply