Necessity is determined by how one defines and confines the parameters required to reach the requisite conclusion; if the criteria governing the roadmap to a successful outcome is replete with heightened qualitative specifications, greater care and effort may be mandated; conversely, if a looser, more informal measure is imposed, the tendency is to respond accordingly.
But what determines the response — outside influences, or one’s own standard of excellence? In Hume’s argument concerning causality, of course, the prerequisites defined were instituted at the outset to defeat the argument for causality; by setting up the requirement of what constitutes a “necessary connection” in order to establish a causal connection, he allowed for no amount of evidence which would satisfy his rule; thus, it was already a self-contained tautology from the outset.
For preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits, whether the Federal or Postal employee is under FERS or CSRS, the question becomes: Does the medical condition itself determine the extent of groundwork necessary for a successful approval from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, or should the identical set of stringent prerequisites be satisfied regardless of the seriousness of the medical condition? The obvious answer, of course, should always ascribe to the latter, as acceptance of the former entails potential pitfalls which may result in lost time and unnecessary efforts expended for satisfaction of additional stages in the administrative process.
Necessary connections in a Federal Disability Retirement application must be proven and established at all levels; for, as the age-old adage reminds us, it is the weakest link in the chain of arguments which will ultimately defeat the entire structure of an otherwise solid case.
It is the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, through statutory impositions and regulatory requirements, which has “pre-set” the necessary connections to be made in proving eligibility for Federal Disability Retirement benefits; it is up to the applicant (you) to make sure that all such causal connections are established, proven, confirmed and supported, in order to ensure the best chances for success in an administrative process fraught with human frailties and foibles.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Theory and Practice: Tips and Strategies for a Successful Application | Tagged: a logically connected and consistent fers disability application claim, a process that requires proof and documentation, a requirement a fers disability retirement applicant can't ignore, a successful outcome in fers disability retirement requires planning, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, changes in eligibility requirements opm disability law, connecting legal standards and sufficiency tests, connecting your disability to your federal occupation, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, different nexus to connect in the federal disability retirement application, documentation required to prove disability to the office of personnel management, don't confuse the basic theoretical requirements to begin to think about applying for fers disability retirement versus the actual medical and legal requirements to get approved, eligibility requirements to qualify for postal service disability, FERS Disability, going to unknown lands require a roadmap and a guide, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, law requirements in the medical report for the fers federal disability application, legal requirements to file opm fers disability retirement, medical documentation required to get an opm disability approval, medical retirement for federal workers in connecticut, nationwide representation of federal employees, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, providing a roadmap to your federal disability package, representing federal employees from any us government agency, statutory requirements in OPM disability law, the act of filling out federal disability standard forms is just a prerequisite, the bridge that connects the two most important dots in an opm disability claim, the complex medical and especially legal terminology hiding those connections and definitions you need to prove in a federal disability retirement claim, the connection between language and reality in federal disability retirement claims: a clear explanation of how medical conditions affect specific duties in the workplace, the connections you need in this imperfect word: connecting yourself with an attorney experienced in federal disability retirement matters, the connections you need to establish in a federal disability retirement case, the credibility of the opm disability application roadmap, the legal and medical connections you need to explain in your application to qualify for fers disability retirement are hidden deep in the presumptuous parlance of complex regulations and case laws, the roadmap that will guide your fers disability application to success |
Leave a Reply