Heidegger represents a culmination of sorts — of a philosopher caught in the historicity of his own time and making (with allegations of collaborating with the Nazi party), while proposing a methodology of modern philosophy which embraces the issues important to modernity — essence, value, and the meaning of one’s existence.
In this society of technological adaptation, where the separation of humanity from machines, and the chasm of isolation which expands exponentially, resulting in greater incidents of psychiatric desolation; it is important to pause and reflect upon the value of the human being.
For the Federal or Postal employee who has worked tirelessly to “advance the mission of the agency”, but who now finds him/herself with a medical condition which prevents him/her from performing all of the essential elements of one’s job — how does the agency act/react? Does it manifest compassion, empathy, and most importantly — loyalty?
In order for the conceptual paradigm of “loyalty” to have any meaning, it must be bilateral — meaning, inclusive in both directions. But too often, loyalty is based merely on “what has he/she done for the agency today?” The meaning of one’s existence is too closely tied to one’s work; the value of human worth is too easily discarded when one’s work is disrupted; and the truth of one’s being is too readily revealed when a medical condition intersects and interrupts one’s ability/inability to perform one’s job.
Heidegger, in the end, was probably right; the “things” we do are mere distractions to the ultimate fate of our being; but in the meantime, we must continue to strive, to live.
Federal Disability Retirement is a benefit which exists in order to continue to live. It allows for a Federal or Postal worker to continue in another vocation, and to have that rehabilitative period to focus upon the important things in life: of health, of value, and of family relationships. Don’t tie yourself too closely to some faceless agency’s “mission”; the first and primary mission is the worth of the individual human being.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Reflections of an OPM Disability Retirement Lawyer | Tagged: a new life of opportunities after medical retirement from the federal government, a new life of recuperation after an injury or illness in the federal workplace, accepting opm disability clients all across america, addressing logical and philosophical issues in the long federal disability process, applying philosophical principles to law, beginning a new life after illness and a federal job, civil service disability, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, disability matters to the federal employee - life not worth living?, Federal Disability, federal disability retirement and the true meaning of life, FERS disability retirement, fighting feelings of worthlessness during the opm disability application, getting your life back to normality and recuperation with fers disability retirement, health worth finding and the ministry of federal disability healing, life after an accident while working for the federal government, looking ahead in life after federal disability retirement, maintaining your options open after an injury in the federal workplace, medical benefits for civilian federal workers, opm disability as part of the rehabilitation and healing process, OPM disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, postal service disability retirement, postal workers with serious illnesses and disabilities, recuperating from an illness after working for the federal government, reflections on how that job related injury will affect your federal career, the disabled federal employee and career changes, the Heidegger's proposition, the injured federal employee and a second chance and career, the value of good health and the meaning of life for a federal employee, the value of health is appreciated more after a disability, the word of the philosopher can be called prophetic: a new opportunity with federal disability retirement, USPS disability retirement, value of a human being not defined by disabilities |
Leave a Reply