That is a rather presumptuous title, one might declare; for, it is always the “we” that others presume to know, as opposed to limiting the declarative within the restrictive confines of one’s self, family and surrounding community.
What is the great equalizer that allows for the collective plural pronoun? Is it television (i.e., do “we” all watch the same shows and thus form a conglomerate of a universal consciousness)? There was once a time when one could argue that a unity of convention existed — especially harkening back to the days when there were essentially 3 networks to choose from, and where all three were similar in content, thought and approach.
In modernity, is it the Internet? But the worldwide “web’ is too diverse to narrowly formulate a cumulative effect of similar normative beliefs.
Perhaps that is why society in general is so diverse and fractured; where even a simple consensus amidst a small community cannot be reached, and how geographic differences have become exponentially and irreversibly altered and separated from one another.
Who are we? Yes, the inversion substitution of the second word with the third makes the declarative into a query, and changes the entire subject matter. It is, perhaps, both a statement and a question, and neither make sense, anymore. And so we are left with a singular voice — of a monologue and an aside, or as in a play, a soliloquy, where the character asks the universal question, Who am I? Am I the collective consciousness of my direct descendent, and does that have meaningfulness, anymore? Why do we seek answers by purchasing and sending away “DNA kits”, as if the spiral spectrum of cellular anomalies would be able to answer the question which haunts us all?
For Federal employees and U.S. Postal workers who suffer from a medical condition such that the medical condition prevents the Federal or Postal employee from performing one or more of the essential elements of one’s Federal or Postal job, the potential loss of one’s identity within the community of Federal and Postal workers is often the step that is difficult to take.
One’s identity, purpose, drive and dreams are often bundled up into an inseparable conglomeration of work and identity, and to separate from that self-identification is often a difficult venture to undertake. But the danger, of course, is that you may be forcibly separated if you do not take the steps necessary to protect your identity.
The Agency will ultimately terminate you, and the harassment because you have taken too much Sick Leave, Annual Leave, FMLA or LWOP is inevitable. Better that you file for FERS Disability Retirement benefits and retain a semblance of who you are, lest the Federal Agency or the Postal Service does that to you unilaterally, leaving you with the question, Who do they think they are?
Robert R. McGill, Esquire