In this postmodern era, is there such a thing? What was once illogical — or, even worse, absurd — is now considered an acceptable and viable argument.
Logical fallacies are accepted; non-sequiturs are fully embraced; whether or not the “middle term” is carried over from the major premise to the minor is irrelevant; and “just because” is nowhere blinked at, as the final conclusion to every argument these days is that “everyone is entitled to his or her opinion” and it matters not whether specific facts undermine a viewpoint expressed.
Thus, does it even make a difference whether or not an argument is “viable” enough?
For Federal employees and U.S. Postal workers who are considering filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management under FERS, an argument used in attempting to persuade OPM to approve your Federal Disability Retirement application is one which must appeal to the Statute, the Regulations, or to MSPB and/or Federal Circuit Court of Appeals Case-Law precedents.
Yes, there is still a distinction between an irrelevant, weak and inconsequential argument, and a viable one. The viable argument is one based upon facts, the law, and an irrefutable delineation logical fortitude. In order to make the viable argument, contact an OPM Disability Attorney who specializes in Federal Medical Retirement Law.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill
Lawyer exclusively representing Federal and Postal employees to secure their Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Filed under: Pre-Application Considerations | Tagged: appealing federal employee medical retirement denial, bipolar disorder cases at post office, burden of proof on medical necessity fers, can custodians receive early medical retirement from the postal service?, civil service employee with ptsd having problems at work, complains about federal owcp representative in fers disability case help, disability payments from the postalservice, employee fit for duty guidelines opm, federal disability retirement documentation needed, federal medical inability to do your duty us gov position, federal technician stress leave, fehb and disability retirement benefits, fers disability attorney washington dc psychiatric, fers disability lawyer serving san antonio tx employees, fers disability retirement benefits lawyer, gs employee medical retirement forms to file for early pension, how do I resign from the us postal service for medical reasons, how hard is it to get a federal disability retirement? it depends on your condition and doctor support and attorney help, how to file scheduled award owcp and medical retirement, how to get medical retirement from the post office, how to take extended or permanent sick leave from post office, if owcp process for surgery approval fails what are my options, legal assistance sf 3112 disability retirement application package, lwop terminated medical condition federal, medical examination paperwork us department of labor disability retirement, nerve damage federal owcp medical retirement, opm disabilities are those which interfere with job performance, opm disability codes us gov employees, opm disability retirement processing time 2016, opm hostile and abusive work environment depression, opm policies failed on job reassignment due to injury or illness, owcp claim status check disability retirement, owcp letter for reconsideration and plan b, Post Office disability, postal service disability benefits, postal workers bipolar disorder, proposed removal from federal service due to mental condition, schedule award plus disability retirement springdale fusion, schedule awards and disability retirement for federal employees, sf 3112 help, standard form 3112c legal assistance, terminal illness federal employee, the supervisor statement medical condition federal employment, usps inability to accommodate or reassign help fers disability, usps medical diagnosis, what is the advantage of disability retirement under fers, when disability doctor approves a federal employee’s case what is next |
Leave a Reply