That is often the line of argument: Since it is an “administrative process”, it is not adversarial. This presumes quite a bit — such as, the term “adversarial” is constrained to applying only in such cases where a trial, a courtroom, and witnesses exist. But if that is the case, then doesn’t that occur in a Hearing before the Merit Systems Protection Board? But that, too, is an “Administrative Process.”
Such an argument, of course, is often used by Human Resources personnel to attempt to dissuade Federal and Postal workers of the necessity of retaining an attorney to file for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS. Yet, further presumptions & assumptions would have to be made if one were to accept the argument that an “administrative process” is “non-adversarial”, such as: the personnel who review and evaluate Federal Disability Retirement applications are “objective” and have no interest in approving or disapproving a case (this assumes that having or not having an interest in X makes the process “non-adversarial); or, that the Office of Personnel Management is merely applying the law in reviewing a Federal Disability Retirement application (this presumes that such application of the law is performed and accomplished correctly). The concept of determining that a process is “administrative” does not exclude the reality that the same process is also “adversarial“; the two concepts are not mutually exclusive, and is not defined only within a universe where there are two or more contrary or opposing interests involved.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Clarifications of Laws or Rules, OPM Disability Process | Tagged: accepting opm disability clients all across america, administrative or adversarial process, an 'unselfish' tip from your agency/employer: you don't need an opm disability attorney, an opm administrative process that should be non-adversarial, application of a structured and fair legal process in federal disability retirement, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, cary nc fers csrs disability lawyer, cedar rapids ia fers csrs disability retirement law firm, civil service disability, columbia sc disability retirement for federal employees, coral springs fl medical retirement for federal employees, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, disability retirement for federal employees, federal disability law blog, federal disability lawyer, FERS disability retirement, FERS medical retirement, fullerton ca federal disability law firm, if the opm can afford to approve every single opm disability retirement application, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal representation for injured federal workers, legal services for federal and postal workers all across america, mcallen tx opm disability law firm, mesquite tx opm disability lawyer, nationwide representation of federal employees, OPM disability attorney, opm disability is supposed to be non adversarial but...., opm disability law: theory and practice, opm disability not an adversarial process in theory, OPM disability retirement, opm's own interest in approving or disapproving federal disability claims, Post Office disability, postal service disability retirement, representing federal employees from any us government agency, representing federal employees in and outside the country, resources for injured federal workers, retaining a federal disability lawyer for your own good, sterling heights mi legal representation for disabled federal workers, sunnyvale ca opm disability attorney, taking advice from your adversary (the agency), technical difference between opm disability law theory and practice, the administrative and adversarial opm disability process, the federal disability process: an administrative procedure only in theory, the non-adversarial opm disability process argument - theory and practice, two non-mutually exclusive concepts in opm disability theory and practice, usps disability is supposed to be administrative non adversarial procedure, USPS disability retirement, whether the opm disability legal advice comes from the wolf or the sheep, why it's better to see the federal disability process as an 'adversarial' process |
Leave a Reply