In preparing, formulating and filing a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS, the medical reports and treatment notes, office notes, etc., will often bifurcate and conceptually distinguish between a “diagnosis” of a medical condition, and the description of “symptoms” which the patient experiences.
Thus, as a simplified example, on a physical level, one might have the diagnosis of “Shoulder Impingement Syndrome” or “Rotator Cuff Tendonitis” in a specific category in a medical report under “Diagnosis”, but in a narrative paragraph discussing the history of the symptoms manifested by the individual, there may be a reference to “chronic pain”, or “radiating pain”. Similarly, in psychiatric cases, one might be diagnosed with “Major Depressive Disorder” or “Generalized Anxiety Disorder“, without being officially diagnosed with “Panic Disorder” or “Agoraphobia”, but in a discussion concerning the Federal Employee’s symptomatologies, there may be a reference to having “panic attacks” or being fearful of leaving the house or going out into the public.
The conceptual bifurcation between “diagnosis” and “symptoms”, however, may (and perhaps should) be carefully brought together in completing the Applicant’s Statement of Disability. Thus, while “pain”, “chronic pain”, “radiating pain”, etc., may not officially qualify as the officially diagnosed medical condition in a medical report, in preparing and formulating an Application for Federal Disability Retirement benefits, it is important to interweave such symptoms if they are a prominent part of one’s medical conditions. Similarly, “Panic Attacks”, even if merely described as a symptom, may be an important part — if not the “essence” of a psychiatric condition — of one’s medical condition, and it is important to include it as part of the diagnosis. For, when an approval is granted from the Office of Personnel Management, the identified medical diagnosis should, if at all possible, include the most debilitating of medical conditions.
That which is conceptually distinguished on a medical report need not necessarily dictate what is described and delineated on one’s Application for Disability Retirement. Just some thoughts.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Application - SF 3112A Applicant's Statement of Disability for CSRS and FERS | Tagged: civil service disability retirement, describing the applicable symptoms in the usps disability application, differentiating symptoms and conditions in an opm narrative report, disability retirement for federal employees, disabling diagnosis information on narrative report, explaining my medical conditions in the applicant's statements, Federal Disability, federal disability retirement, FERS disability lawyer, FERS disability retirement, fers medical conditions federal workers comp, filing for OPM disability retirement, identifying minor conditions as symptoms of your primary medical condition, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, making sure that you describe all the symptoms of your medical condition, medical condition's symptomatology and opm disability retirement, nationwide representation of federal employees, OPM disability retirement, opm medical diagnosis and treatments, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, talking about your medical conditions workers comp, the limited importance of a formal diagnosis in a federal disability retirement claim, the significance of symptoms in fers medical disability, the symptoms and the diagnosis in the narrative report, USPS disability retirement benefits | Leave a comment »