In graduate school, the undersigned attorney once presented a paper on a comparative analysis involving a Chinese philosopher. At the end of the presentation, the professor asked a question pointedly: “Is there such a thing as Chinese philosophy?”
The question, of course, went straight to the traditional paradigm underpinning Western philosophical thought: of logical analysis; of syllogistic, Aristotelian methodology; of, “If A, then B”, etc. — as opposed to short, concise, declarative statements illustrating history, community, context and wisdom.
In other words, the difference between persuasion as a methodology in a universal sense, applied across any and all cultural lines, as opposed to the micro-application of wisdom within a given community. For, in either sense, it is ultimately wisdom after which we seek.
There is, indeed, a tradition in Western Philosophy, beginning with the Pre-Socratics, onward through Plato, Aristotle, the Medievals, to the present where deconstructionism has essentially inversely cannibalized philosophy, in which the issue of what constitutes a persuasive argument must be questioned.
Can a paternalistic declaration of wisdom prevail in a debate? Is a mere assertion of truth enough to convince? In any legal context, one must systematically present one’s case with facts and “the law”.
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, one must take care and follow the traditional rules of persuasive argumentation. In a family, the rule of Mom and Dad may prevail; in a community, a Confucius-like paternalism may be effective; in the arena of law, one must take care and systematically present a persuasive, logically coherent argument.
Only by following in such a methodology of persuasion can one expect success in preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Reflections of an OPM Disability Retirement Lawyer | Tagged: a clear and concise writing to persuade your target audience: the federal disability retirement specialist, a good legal argument is often as important as the substance of the argument itself, an attorney who spends 100% of his time in federal disability retirement, applying for federal disability, approaching your opm disability claim in a persuasive manner, argumentation in federal disability law, argumentation principles learned in philosophy and applied in opm law, blog writing on federal disability retirement issues, case disability retirement and legal arguments on your behalf, complex argumentation in federal disability applications, crafting effective persuasive arguments in your opm disability retirement application, describing your disability argument in plain english, disability retirement at the USPS, effective argumentation in federal disability retirement applications, efficacy and limitation of legal argumentation in opm disability claims, engaging in a opm disability case through persuasion, essential elements of jobs, federal injury blogs, FERS disability lawyer, filing a very persuasive federal disability application, legal persuasion in the initial federal disability application, letter carrier blog website for disabilities, paradigms and eligibility criteria for retirement from us government, persuasive argumentation in the federal disability retirement application, resources for injured federal workers, supporting your case with persuasive arguments and establishing a nexus to win the approval of a federal disability retirement application, the art of persuasion in fers disability retirement law, the issue of what constitutes a persuasive argument and how can it be used to win a federal disability retirement claim, the legal and medical persuasive impact of your opm disability claim, the sequential and persuasive use of language throughout the federal disability retirement process, USPS disability retirement benefits, western philosophy and persuasive legal arguments in an opm disability retirement claims, what is persuasive argumentation in federal disability retirement cases, writing a persuasive legal analysis of your case, writing a persuasively descriptive narrative for opm disability | Leave a comment »