The practice of the philosophical school of “Pragmatism” is what many Americans associate themselves with — precisely because America was, and continues to be (as of late, anyway), a country which invents, manufactures, creates, etc., and prides itself on its technological “forward-thinking” ways.
Pragmatism is a uniquely American philosophical approach — one in which William James (an American) had an influence upon, where the methodology of determining truth consisted in the combination of the correspondence theory of truth and what he considered a “coherence” theory of truth, where not only did a given statement need to have a correspondence with the physical world, but moreover, the entirety of the statement had to “cohere” with other statements asserted. Pragmatism is an “applied” approach.
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, it is always important to remember the “nuts and bolts” of putting together a Federal Disability Retirement application. In other words, one must take a very “pragmatic” approach to the entire administrative process.
From dealing with doctors who may be skeptical about his or her ability to relate a medical condition to one’s positional duties in the Federal government or in the Postal Service; to making sure that the Human Resources department assists in processing the Federal disability retirement application; to writing an effective and compelling Applicant’s Statement of Disability — these are all considerations where the subject of the application — the very person who is suffering from the medical condition — must set aside the anxieties, frustrations and fears, and set about to pragmatically put together an effective Federal Disability Retirement application.
As “pragmatism” finds its roots in the Greek word pragma, from which we get the words “practical” and “practice”, so it is important to consult with those who have the experience in the very practice of Federal Disability Retirement law. Indeed, coherence and correspondence are two traits which the Office of Personnel Management looks for in a Federal Disability Retirement application. William James would have been a good lawyer for Federal Disability Retirement law.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Reflections of an OPM Disability Retirement Lawyer | Tagged: a simple and pragmatic approach in dealing with your fers disability claim: hire somebody with experience, accepting opm disability clients all across america, administrative law theory and practice, applicant's statement of disability, attorney experienced in dealing with fers disability retirement claims, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, experience and results for federal employee disability claims, Federal Disability, federal disability retirement, FERS disability lawyer, FERS disability retirement, from the experience of a full time federal disability retirement attorney, hiring a lawyer who knows all the nuts and bolts in opm disability, nationwide representation of federal employees, one of the few attorneys experienced with "csrs" disability retirement, OPM disability retirement, philosophers as lawyers, philosophical pragmatism to the domain of opm disability law, Postal disability, pragmatic methodology, pragmatism in federal disability law, professional integrity and experience in opm disability law, representing federal employees from any us government agency, taking a pragmatic approach to fers disability retirement, the "nuts and bolts" of federal disability retirement, the best expertise available in opm disability retirement, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, the story of human tragedy as a very pragmatic methodology, theory and practice in opm disability law, Tips and tricks for the filling out the Applicant's Statement of Disability, tips for federal workers filing for disability, USPS disability retirement, usps disability retirement blog | Leave a comment »