In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, it is important to make discretionary decisions concerning multiple aspects of a Federal Disability Retirement application — including the volume, extent, nature, and quality of the medical documentation to be submitted.
Because it is the Applicant (the Federal or Postal employee who is submitting the application) who has the “burden of proof” — that burden which states that by a preponderance of the evidence, one’s Federal Disability Retirement application is more likely to be so than not so — it is therefore up to the Applicant to make determinations as to the quality and quantity of the medical documentation and any other relevant attachments.
Qualitative sufficiency is often a difficult measure to determine; quantitative significance is equally difficult — as in, how much is enough? On the one hand, to submit a thousand pages of medical notes, reports, etc., would probably be “too much”. But a case which only includes 5 pages of medical reports and notes, while seemingly “too little”, can be more than sufficient if the quality of the records and reports is indisputable and irrefutable in determining that a Federal or Postal employee is no longer able to perform one or more of the essential elements of one’s job.
Ultimately, the discretionary decision will come down to a matter of experience — for it is based upon prior experience that one can make better decisions for the future. To that extent, to be inrepresented in attempting to obtain Federal Disability Retirement benefits is obviously a disadvantage, because an unexperienced Applicant is merely entering into the arena of Federal Disability Retirement law based upon a “hit or miss” history of inexperience.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The Applicant | Tagged: attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, avoiding a quantitative approach when filing for opm disability retirement, burden of medical documentation to support a federal disability retirement case, Burden of Production, choosing what medical documents you want the opm to see, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, Federal Disability, federal disability retirement, FERS disability lawyer, FERS disability retirement, filing for OPM disability retirement, getting relevant medical documentation key in securing opm disability, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal representation for injured federal workers, medical documentation guidelines, meeting the burden of eligibility requirements for medical retirement under fers, more than enough medical documentation, OPM disability retirement, opm supportive medical documentation, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, postal service disability retirement, quality versus quantity on medical documentation, quantity and quality of information in the internet about the fdr process, relevance over quantity in opm medical retirement paperwork, relevance over quantity on disability medical documentation, relevant criteria to choose the right medical documentation fers disability, selecting only the best medical documentation for the fers claim, the importance of supporing medical documentation for a postal disability application, USPS disability retirement, usps medical documentation requirements, what documents should I turn over opm for my disability claim? | Leave a comment »