Wittgenstein’s conceptual identification of society’s creation of various “language games” is indicative of a relativistic approach to truth and reality. For, Wittgenstein rejected the classical tradition of the correspondence theory of truth, where language corresponds to events in the “objective” physical realm, and in the course of such correspondence, arrives at a notion of objective truth. Instead, the world of language is an artificial creation within the consciousness of societies, and is tantamount to board games which we play.
In preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether under FERS or CSRS, it is often interesting and instructive to view the entire bureaucratic process as a kind of “language game” which one must master and engage in. Indeed, encounters with how one’s own agency views the game, then how OPM views the game, can be quite shocking.
The fact that it is not a “game” per se, for the Federal or Postal employee who is depending upon the Federal Disability Retirement annuity for his or her livelihood for the short-term, does not undermine the fact that agencies and OPM act as if it is just another board game — say, for instance, chess, in the the manner in which various strategic moves and counter-moves are made to try and corner the Federal or Postal employee; or the classical game of go, in which territories are asserted and surrounded in order to “defeat” the opponent.
Language is meant to convey meaning and to communicate human value, worth, emotions and factual occurrences as reflected in the physical world; it is only us humans who create a universe of artifice in which we sequester ourselves in order to torment the weaker members of such participants. But because language is the only game within the realm of human living, we must contend with the language games played by Federal agencies, and especially the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Reflections of an OPM Disability Retirement Lawyer | Tagged: a game of deception and decoy, agencies to injured workers: no jobs so resign, approaching truth and reality as the opm and other us agencies perceive them, becoming discouraged during opm disability process, choosing the right strategy to get opm disability benefits, disability retirement and your agency's power game, disability retirement federal agencies, discouragement as part of the opm's strategy, discouragement or second thoughts too often defeat a federal disability application, fers disability retirement: defeating the opm by playing their own games and under their own rules, how agencies master their own language games against the federal employee, how the agencies and the opm perceived a disabled federal applicant, language and human condition in the 3112, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, looking at ''objective truth" through the eyes of the opm during the fers disability process, medical conditions must be explained in plain english for the 3112c, one key ingredient for a successful fers disability claim: effective communication, opm disability is like a chess game: thinking about your enemy's moves ahead of time, opm disability law and language, perception vs. reality about the federal disability retirement application, qualifying medical conditions and the use of language in a federal disability claim, shouting ''it's not fair'' and lose -- or playing the opm's game and win, strategies the opm uses to defeat a federal disability application, strategists for a good opm disability application, the discouraged and injured postal worker, the federal disability process: more than a game at stake for the applicant, time to plan a successful federal disability outcome for the postal worker, using clear language in your fers disability retirement application, viewing federal disability retirement as a board game -- with plans and strategies needed to win | Leave a comment »