The Performance Improvement Plan (otherwise known by the acronym, a “PIP”) is the formal imposition of an administrative procedural process to “assist” the employee into improving his or her specific work requirements, or for modification of certain behavior issues.
From the Federal Agency’s perspective, it invokes a paper trail which will justify additional future actions, if necessary. From the Federal employee’s viewpoint, it should serve as a warning that unknown other conversations and discussions have been ongoing, and the PIP is merely a surface revelation, with much underworld life and activity unrevealed but indicated by the issuance of the PIP.
If a medical condition is a large part of the reason why underperformance and poor performance justifies the issuance of a PIP, then revelation of the medical condition in response to the PIP should be considered.
Concurrently, because a PIP is an open and declared step towards ultimate and likely termination — especially when the physical or mental condition will continue to prevent the Federal employee from being able to meet the requirements of the PIP — it is a good idea to begin the process of preparing, formulating and filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits, whether under FERS or CSRS, submitted to the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Being a sitting duck merely means that you are the target in a shooting gallery; before your turn comes up, it serves the Federal and Postal employee well to chart one’s own course before it is determined for you.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Agency’s and/or Supervisor’s Actions | Tagged: actions by federal agencies against their disabled employees, adverse action for sick leave "misconduct", adverse action on excessive unscheduled lwop, agency actions against federal employee, attorney for civil service disability claims, best legal representation for disabled usps postal workers, current performance evaluations and fers disability retirement, disability retirement application federal employees, disciplinary actions for medical conditions against federal workers, disruptive behavior or a medical condition at the USPS, federal disability blog, federal disability retirement in any state of territory of the United States, federal disability retirement lawyer with many years of experience, federal employees with psychiatric disabilities and violent behaviors, federal non disciplinary actions, fehb benefits on disability retirement federal and postal employees, fers disability and other options, filing and pursuing a disability retirement application, filing disability with the postal service, for those disabled federal workers being placed on a pip, great occupational evaluation reviews before the opm disability retirement application, health conditions that impact job performance in the federal agency, impending adverse actions against the disabled federal employee?, law firm opm disability, law firm serving disabled federal workers all across america, lawyer representing federal employees for disability retirement throughout the united states, learning what the federal agency is really up to by issuing an pip, nationwide federal disability law firm, opm disability law firm, owcp disability and fers retirement, Performance Improvement Plan (PIP), performance issues during the opm disability application, pip, postal actions against the disabled employee, postal disability fers, postal disability retirement blog, predicting the future behavior of a large bureaucracy, questions & answers about fers federal disability retirement, setting a performance improvement plan (pip) as a means for failure, the postal service's bad behavior with disabled federal employees, the use and abuse of PIPs in the federal workplace, usps ''disciplinary'' actions, usps disability retirement health benefits, usps performance reviews can be used as disability evidence, usps suspensions and other attendance issues while in sick leave, when the agency seeks non-adversarial removal, when the federal employee is placed on a pip, when the federal employee is put on suspension for what is really an underlying medical condition, why federal employers really use performance improvement plans | Leave a comment »
FERS & CSRS Disability Retirement for Federal and USPS Workers: The Limitation of Agency Actions
Often, in the process of filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS, the client will ask the question, “Well, doesn’t that prove that I can’t do the job?” Such a question invariably points to some action by the Agency — a letter or a memorandum; a statement which the Supervisor made, etc. While it may be true that the Agency believes that a Federal or Postal employee is unable to perform, or is not performing, all of the essential elements of the job, remember that actions of the Agency can never replace the affirmative burden of proof that one is unable, medically, to perform the essential elements of one’s job.
One must keep in mind that the Office of Personnel Management is a separate Agency which is not necessarily in communication with the Agency which employs the Federal or Postal employee. The “mindset” of the Agency is not being considered by the Office of Personnel Management. Whatever the motivations of the Agency in doing what it is or will do, is to a great extent irrelevant to OPM. What the Agency is doing may well indicate “proof” as to other issues — i.e., inability to accommodate; acknowledgment that certain essential elements of one’s job is not being performed, etc. — but it does not prove that an individual is unable, as a result of a medical condition, to perform all of the essential elements of the job. Only a doctor can do that.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Agency’s and/or Supervisor’s Actions | Tagged: about the opm disability support claim from the us agency, accepting opm disability clients all across america, agency's influence in disability retirement, agency's influence on the opm disability claim is limited, agency's influence versus power to grant opm disability, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, building a strong disability claim in the federal workplace, communication among federal agencies, disability retirement at the USPS, disability retirement for federal employees, federal disability is not determined by agency that employs you, federal disability lawyer, federal employee disability, federal supervisor response to employee work injury, fers disability and communication issues among federal agencies, fers disability application supervisor comments, FERS disability lawyer, FERS medical retirement, how much can a fed employer influence the fers disability application?, how to prove a federal employee disability claim, injured federal employee: don't wait for the agency to do things right, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, legal services for federal and postal workers all across america, opm disability and the stated support from your agency, OPM disability attorney, owcp disability retirement, personal injury in a federal agency, proving you are eligible to medically retire from the federal government, representing federal employees from any us government agency, representing federal employees in and outside the country, statutory requirements in OPM disability law, the applicant's and the agency's legal arguments over opm disability, the influence of the agency in an fers disability claim is minimal, the lack of communication among the opm and your federal employer, the limited power of a supervisor in the fers disability retirement process, the most influential person in the fers disability retirement the, the perception of accommodation among federal supervisors, the real power of the agency in cases of opm disability, USPS disability retirement benefits, usps supervisors and their impact on the postal employee's disability, when the agency seeks non-adversarial removal | Leave a comment »