It is for that function or use in society that we strive in our early years; while some may argue that the extrinsic relationship between career and one’s natural abilities make for an artificial coalescence of man-to-meaning, nevertheless, the adaptation to societal needs results in the correspondence between man’s inherent want and the contribution to a greater good.
But what happens when, later in life, the fusion of ability with societal need is abandoned? What if work no longer can be performed, goals cannot be met, and wants cannot be fulfilled? We are in a phase where we preach to our children that they should find a career in which natural talents are utilized, where inner satisfaction is achieved, and a sense of accomplishment is fulfilled.
A generation or so ago, we merely thanked society for offering a decent wage and a higher standard of living. Then, something went awry — the gap between the worker and management became a wider chasm of discontent; magazines and video clips revealed the limitless narcissism of wealth and unfettered greed; and mediocrity of talentless actors revealed that even they, too, can achieve stardom despite lack of any appreciable achievement.
For Federal employees and U.S. Postal workers who suffer from a medical condition, such that the medical condition prevents one from performing the pathway of a chosen career with the Federal agency or the U.S. Postal Service, the separation from one’s work and position may take an unspoken toll — not just because of the medical condition, but further, as a result of losing the natural teleology the Federal or Postal worker had striven so strenuously to achieve.
Filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, whether the Federal employee or Postal worker is under FERS, CSRS or CSRS Offset, is never an easy road.
Others may believe that securing an annuity because of one’s inability to perform one or more of the essential elements of one’s Federal or Postal positional duties is tantamount to winning a lottery of sorts, but the reality is that most Federal or Postal employees who file for OPM Disability Retirement benefits, if given the choice, would forego the benefit if the medical condition would resolve itself and health would dictate the course of one’s future and fate, and not its corollary, of illness and a chronic medical condition.
Throughout youth, one always strove to discover the natural teleology for value and place in society; when that essence of human need is suddenly lost or severed, it is time to reignite that loss of self, and to prepare an effective Federal Disability Retirement application in order to enter into the next stage of life’s arena of meaning, value and worth.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Reflections of an OPM Disability Retirement Lawyer, Uncategorized | Tagged: anxiety for dod disabled employees, anxiety of waiting for fers disability retirement, arizona federal disability attorney, attorney civil service retirement service depression, attorney medical documents for fers disability, bop incapacity retirement attorney, bureau of prisons medical retirement lawyer, collecting evidence depression opm disability retirement lawyer, copying a medical narrative example disability is not effective because each case is unique, definition of light duty disability retirement for federal employees, disability benefit from postal service, disability retirement attorney for va employee, disability retirement from the veterans administration, dod reemployed annuitant disability retirement is their salary offset? the offset is in reference with ssdi but you can’t make more than 80%, faa clerk with excessive med absences requesting opm rehab or retirement, faa retirement disability lawyer, federal disability attorney serving st Petersburg employees, federal disability fers attorney serving washington state employees, federal disability law firms in the washington area, federal disability retirement attorney massachusetts, federal employee disability retirement attorney serving in arizona area, federal employee light duty forms template for mental disability, federal employee retirement benefits for the disabled, federal employer trying to terminate due to chronic medical condition, federal government disability anxiety panic, fers disability retirement individual unemployability, fers disability retirement what you need to know, fired from the bop before my disability retirement is approved, florida usps attorney for injured postal employee, forced faa stress leave attorney, legal counsel usps form sf 3112, mass opm disability attorney, medical resignation or termination in federal service, medically retire from bop, narcolepsy fers opm retirement benefits, neck shoulder pain occupational postal carrier, new jersey postal attorney, non work related accident disability, ohio postal and federal employment lawyer, opm, opm disability lawyer maryland retirement, opm disability retirement processing attorney for philadelphia residents, opm disability review, opm dr documentation for fers disability, opm federal government request for fit for duty and disability termination, opm fers disability retirement depression, opm fers usps medical incapacity, opm medical retirement payments, opm workman's compensation medical pension, owcp heart attack disability retirement is through the opm, owcp postal injury insurance attorney, owcp standard forms annuity pension attorney, owcp stress disability long term leave dod employee, philadelphia opm disability lawyer, postal disability lawyers in Arizona, postal employment attorney for medical disability issues, postal retirement services disability, ptsd can I medically retire from usps? yes but you must prove your case, repetitive injury from postal work attorney, sf 3112 disability application package help, sick leave fers credit lawyer, st. petersburg fl opm disability law attorney, standard form 3112a for disability, statutory requirement for federal retirement benefits for disabled, supervisors causing hostility in the postal service against disabled employees, time period for fers disability to go through is usually about 6 to 8 months but can take much longer if denied in first stage, united states postal service disability ret, us postal office termination proposals against the disabled, usps light duty request for mental disability options, va employee disability retirement attorney, va ssdi and fers medical opm, washington state federal opm disability retirement, washington state fers disability retirement, when rehabilitation of a disabling condition fails and the postal employee needs an attorney for postal medical retirement application, years of creditable service for federal disability retirement | Leave a comment »
OPM Disability Retirement: Service Deficiency & Medical Condition
The Office of Personnel Management will often use as a criteria of denial the argument/basis that despite the fact that an individual may have a medical condition such that the medical documentation states that the Federal or Postal worker can no longer perform one or more of the essential elements of one’s job, nevertheless, there has not been a showing that a “service deficiency” has occurred. Often, agencies systematically write up performance appraisals without much thought or consideration; more often, Federal and Postal workers quietly suffer through his or her medical condition, and strive each day to meet the requirements of their duties.
Whatever the reason for the lack of attention or perception on the part of the supervisor or the agency to recognize that the Federal or Postal worker has not been able to perform one or more of the essential elements of one’s job, such basis for a denial of a disability retirement application by the Office of Personnel Management is not a legitimate one, because existence of a “service deficiency” is not the whole story: if it is found that retention in the job is “inconsistent” with the type of medical condition the Federal or Postal Worker has, then such a finding would “trump” the lack of any service deficiency. That is not something, however, that the Office of Personnel Management is likely to tell you as they deny your disability retirement application.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The Agency, OPM Disability Actors - The Supervisor, U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) | Tagged: adverse agency reaction, agency's extraordinary top assessment in fers disability applications, agency's influence in disability retirement, assessment for postal disability retirement from supervisor, criteria of denial instead of criteria of disability in opm disability, disability retirement csrs, disability retirement usps non job related, disability retirement workers compensation, essential elements of jobs not so essential according to evaluation, federal disability facts, federal disability law firm, federal medical retirement, fers disability application supervisor comments, FERS disability attorney, fers disability attorney in mississippi, fers disability benefits, government postal disability, injured postal workers and their miraculous job evaluations, law firm for federal disability retirement, medical disability lawyers opm, opm disability and the supervisor who says everything's fine, opm disability for federal employees in louisiana, opm disability for federal workers in alabama, opm disability retirement representation in utah, opm supervisor statement disability retirement, opm's excuses to deny your federal disability retirement, owcp disability retirement really is usually meant "opm disability retirement", owcp medical retirement, postal service disability retirement, postal service medical retirement, representing federal employees from any us government agency, representing federal employees in and outside the country, representing us government disability employees anywhere, the incapacitated federal employee without service deficiency, USPS disability retirement benefits, washington state federal opm disability retirement, when supervisors don't notice any medical condition in federal worker, when the agency claims no service deficiency in opm application, when there is no accommodation because there is no job deficiency, when top performance hurts the chances of getting fers disability, when work performance evaluations are near too perfect, Workers Comp disability, workers comp fers retirement, your supervisor and federal disability retirement | Leave a comment »