At what point does the rate of return diminish to the extent that it is “no longer worth it.”? And, what is the “it” referring to? Is it the effort expended in contrast to the compensation received? Is it the dividends paid upon an investment ignored?
Often, in all of the contexts just described, the focus is upon the wrong point; it is not the “end product” or the final sum that should determine the worthwhile aspect of the “rate of return”, but rather, the key term overlooked — not the “return”, but the “rate”. One might argue that the two essentially are the same, inasmuch as the “return” (the sum received) is determined by the “rate” (the calculus that determines). But are they? Doesn’t it depend upon what context it is being applied to?
Certainly, when conceived of in a traditional investment category, the final sum received can be backtracked to the rate that has been applied; but what about other, more non-traditional contexts, such as friendships, work — even marriage? Or does one never apply such cold-hearted calculations when discoursing upon the arena of human relationships? Can we so easily drop friendships and end marriages based upon the same criteria applied in changing investment firms?
Come to think of it, our own lack of active interest is probably the single biggest reason that marriages and friendships last — because, like those investments that we allow to remain because we are too lazy to take an active interest in, many remain in marriages and friendships well beyond the love that has been lost long ago, or the affection that has waned all too subtly; for, in the end, it is our own laziness and lack of motivation that allows the fallowed pastures to let life slowly die in the uncaring tenements of thoughtless stupor.
For Federal employees and U.S. Postal workers that suffer from a medical condition, such that the medical condition begins to prevent the full performance of one’s positional duties and the essential elements of the job, the conceptual paradigm of the “rate of return” should be applied in contemplating whether or not to file for Federal Disability Retirement benefits.
Surely, the Federal Agency or the Postmaster is thinking along the same lines — is he/she getting the job done? Can I get more out of someone else?
That is the Agency’s perspective; but what about yours? Such questions as: Is my health going to improve by remaining? What will the future options be: remain, resign or file for Federal Disability Retirement benefits?
If the first and second choices are no longer real options, then the third one is a necessity, as it becomes clear that the rate of return is no longer a worthwhile investment to remain in a job that clearly is destroying any semblance of one’s quality of life — and that, in the end, is what the purpose of the investment was all about to begin with.
Robert R. McGill, Esquire