There may well be an appropriate time for a lengthy diatribe. The act itself often finds its impetus in bitterness; it also implies a lack of control, overwhelmed by anger and originating in attribution by an act of injustice. But where emotion controls rationality, the loss of sequential propriety normally results in a corresponding lack of coherence and comprehension.
For Federal and Postal Workers who are considering filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits, whether the Federal or Postal Worker is under FERS or CSRS, the urge to right past wrongs is a compelling force which often erupts in a diatribe of sorts, within the content of a Federal Employee Disability Retirement claim. This is, unfortunately, a self-defeating proposition.
Yes, agency actions often comprise a compendium of injustices; yes, treatment of coworkers can be the basis of collateral actions; yes, discriminatory behavior may be a justifiable basis for filing EEO actions; but, no, weaving one’s frustration into the substance of a Federal Disability Retirement application is not the right path to take, for the simple reason that it is not the appropriate venue in which to vent.
Federal and Postal Workers who intend on filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, need to bifurcate the issues, and recognize the practical dualism in existence: OPM is a separate Federal agency from the one employing the chronically ill or injured Federal Worker who intends to submit a Federal disability Retirement application (in most cases, unless of course the Federal employee works for OPM — and even then, the section which reviews the Federal Disability Retirement application is separate and distinct within the agency).
Context and appropriateness are invisible lines which need to be followed. Diatribes may have their place in literature; it rarely serves a useful purpose in filing for CSRS or FERS Disability Retirement benefits through the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability and a Hostile Working Environment | Tagged: a decisive approach to postal disability retirement, a process that requires considerable mental and emotional effort, a proven and established methodology to get your fers disability retirement plan approved, a rational approach to opm disability retirement, an effective approach to federal disability retirement law, an emotional federal disability application, attorney representing federal workers for disability throughout the united states, avoiding emotional reasoning during the opm disability process, avoiding releasing your bitterness in the fers disability claim, disability retirement usps, don't file for an illness related resignation with the federal employee, don't let frustration get into your federal disability retirement application, emotional distress mspb, federal disability form sf3112a questions, federal disability law blog, federal employee medical retirement, federal government hostile work environment, federal government medical retirement, federal law enforcement disability retirement, federal medical retirement, FERS Disability, FERS disability retirement, fers disability workers compensation, focusing on medical substantive issues not emotional problems, getting rid of emotional baggage during fers disability application, hostile work environment federal government, how to get approved for federal employee disability benefits, keeping your tone cool and rational during application, medical disability fers employees, medical retirement federal government, medical retirement from federal government, opm hostile work environment, owcp disability retirement, Postal disability, pragmatic methodology, rational perspective into the fed workers' medical condition, representing federal employees from any us government agency, resignation letter due to illness not needed!, satisfying emotional needs outside the opm disability application, sf 3112, the approach and methodology a disabled federal employee needs, the fers disability application is not the right avenue to release your frustration about the injustices in the federal workplace, the most complete blog on federal disability retirement, the problem of explaining your supervisors' hostilities in an opm disability retirement application, The sf 3112a for disability retirement, the story of human tragedy as a very pragmatic methodology, USPS Disability, verbal attacks by federal employees in medical disability claims, when emotions affect our 'rational' thoughts, workers comp disability retirement | Leave a comment »
OPM Disability Retirement: Differing Perspectives
The old adage, “Walk in your fellow man’s shoes for a mile” is a saying which is meant essentially to teach a child (and many adults) to have a different perspective than one’s own, self-centered universe. In practicing law, it is a good idea to attempt to obtain a perspective from the multitude of differing “shoes” — and this is especially important in putting together a Federal Disability Retirement application under FERS or CSRS.
The gathering of such differing and different perspectives — that of the treating doctor; that of the applicant; that of the Agency (the Supervisor and the Agency in its determination that accommodation or reassignment is not available or appropriate for a given employee, given the particular medical conditions and the type of positional duties of the specific job which the Applicant must perform, as well as taking into account what constitutes “efficiency” in the Federal Service, etc.); and further, that of the Office of Personnel Management.
It is the job of the Attorney representing a Federal or Postal employee in preparing a Federal Disability Retirement packet under FERS or CSRS, to pull together the various perspectives; write up and prepare, and gather the information from the multiple and differing perspectives; to neutralize those perspectives which may impact negatively upon the Federal disability retirement application; then to present the fullness of the different perspectives such that it meets the legal criteria and “perspective” of the Representative from the Office of Personnel Management: that “ultimate” perspective which determines a “yes” or “no” in determining the viability of a Federal Disability Retirement Application.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Application - SF 3112 Disability Retirement Application Package, The Job of a Federal Disability Attorney | Tagged: a compelling medical case for federal employee disability retirement, a rational perspective from your disability claim evaluation, accommodation of federal employees, applicant's statement of disability, attorney that helps injured and ill federal workers, creating a strong case to qualify for fers disability benefits, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, each opm disability stage requires a different approach, early out for disabled postal workers with application, federal disability law and legal argumentation, federal disability lawyer to handle opm disability denial, federal employee disability retirement, federal employee medical retirement, FERS disability retirement, gathering medical documentation for an incapacitated federal employee, getting together different perspectives and making a compelling case, going out on medical disability opm, help for injured or ill federal employees seeking medical retirement, help in collecting medical evidence and putting package together, how to neutralize negative information in your postal disability application, if reassignment is not possible for the light duty federal worker, job reassignment, letter carrier occupational illness, Maintaining an Objective Perspective in a Disability Case, making a compelling federal opm disability case, medical as well as legal factors may determine eligibility in opm retirement, medical condition(s), medical disability lawyers opm, medical incapacitation at the federal agency, neutralizing negative comments and/or information for the disability applicant, occupational illnesses in federal jobs, old adage, OPM disability retirement, opm disability retirement new jersey employees, Post Office disability retirement, postal buyout always available for injured postal workers, Postal Service disability, proof of disability for federal workers, pulling together several perspectives for the fers disability application, putting a federal disability case together, rational perspective into the fed workers' medical condition, top federal disability retirement attorney, USPS disability retirement, when accommodation is not available to the injured federal worker, writing up a legal summary and putting together an opm disability application, your treating doctors | Leave a comment »