Having a sense of shame can reveal a heightened level of moral superiority; but as with all things emanating from the Good, those who lack a sensitivity to propriety will take full advantage of a misguided loyalty to ethical conduct. Work and a duty to one’s vocation is a guiding principle for most Federal and Postal employees. That is precisely why filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits, whether one is under FERS or CSRS, is anathema to the Federal and Postal employee.
The committed Federal and Postal employee often has a warped and misguided sense of his ethical duty to work, and will allow for a medical condition to continue to exacerbate and debilitate, at the expense of one’s deteriorating health, all for the sake of commitment, devotion, and high ethical sense of duty to one’s mission for the agency.
Supervisors and managers recognize this, and take full advantage. But the Federal and Postal employee must by necessity understand that Federal Disability Retirement is a benefit accorded to all Federal and Postal employees precisely for the underlying reasons offered: When a medical condition impacts one’s health such that one can no longer perform all of the essential elements of one’s job, the benefit of Federal Disability Retirement is meant to be accessed precisely because it has always been part of the benefits package for all Federal and Postal employees, whether under FERS or CSRS.
Commitment to a mission is indeed commendable; blind devotion at the expense of one’s own health is somewhat less so — unless one counts the sneering approval of agencies who see such sacrifices as mere paths to the slaughterhouse.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Miscellaneous | Tagged: a few useful assumption and realistic expectations before you take the federal disability retirement train, a loyalty towards a federal agency should have its limitations when there is a disability that won't allow the employee to work in an efficient manner, a question of honor and allegiance: are we supposed to keep being loyal to an agency which has shown no empathy for its disabled employees when they cannot longer perform their current jobs, attorney experienced in dealing with fers disability retirement claims, can the opm take seriously the integrity of federal supervisors?, clashes between management and disabled employees at the us agencies, commitment of the us postal workers, commitment to your federal job at the expense of your well being, decline of genuine empathy after a disability in the workplace, disability and the federal sector and basing your hopes in realistic expectations, disability retirement from the opm and expecting integrity from managers and supervisors, don't always count with the support of an agency supervisor, expect the unexpected when you file for federal disability retirement benefits - a simple warning from an experienced federal disability retirement attorney, expecting bilateral loyalty from your federal employer, expecting ethical behavior from federal agencies, federal disability law firm, federal employees shouldn't apologize for medical benefits, FERS disability retirement, hoping for uncooperative neutrality from agency as a reasonably positive expectation, if postal managers will really support the ill injured postal worker, if your health is more important than your job, isn't good health one of the most important benefits we are willing to keep even at the expense of a good-paying federal or postal job that hurts your continually?, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, no apologies for medical and social circumstances you can't control, not need to feel ashamed for applying for federal disability retirement benefits, postal and federal employees and their often blind commitment to the causes of their employing agencies, postal employment and no apologies for an earned medical benefits, pride or shame to admit a disability in the federal workplace, providing you with a realistic expectation for your fers disability claim, the injured federal worker and his high commitment to excellence, the lack of empathy in the federal workforce with those who suffer from not so obvious medical conditions, the loyalty of a federal agency toward its own employees, the main priority a federal agency is its mission not the welfare of an injured or disabled employee, the rehab federal worker and her commitment to duty, there is never a reason to feel ashamed for pursuing disability retirement under fers or csrs, what's more important for the injured postal worker money or good health?, when a loyal and dedicated postal worker gets hurt, when federal agencies only care about their ''missions'' | Leave a comment »
Federal Employee Medical Retirement: Agency Tendency
A Federal or Postal Worker who has worked for any number of years, already knows (intuitively) what the Agency’s response is going to be when he or she files for Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS or CSRS: Self-protection, minimal cooperation, and a “know nothing” and “do nothing” approach. This is merely the tendency of most agencies. Every now and then, there is an exception to this general perception of how a Federal Agency will respond and react; normally, however, any such exception is merely a reflection upon an exceptional individual — a supervisor who is truly looking out both for the best interests of the agency, as well as for a Federal or Postal worker who deserves praise and cooperation as he or she enters into a difficult phase of life.
Agencies tend to respond in a “self-protective” mode; of covering itself; of being uncooperative, thinking that an individual who is filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits is (A) no longer of any use to the agency, (B) reflects badly upon the overall perception of the agency, or (C) is merely faking the disability. The truth of the matter is that a Federal or Postal employee who is filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits has probably exhausted all possible alternatives, and has killed him/herself in trying to continue to work. However, sympathy and empathy are two emotions which Agencies sorely lack in, both qualitatively and quantitatively; and as with all tendencies, it is good to be aware of them, if only to be on guard.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: OPM Disability Actors - The Agency | Tagged: accepting opm disability clients all across america, adverse agency reaction, agency's loyalty, anticipating the agency's reaction after the opm disability filing, CSRS disability retirement federal attorney, don't always count with the support of an agency supervisor, exhausting all the alternatives for usps rehabilitation, expecting the worst from the postal service when reporting even an injury, fed up with the abusive usps workers comp system, federal agencies: falling into a self-protective mode, federal disability law blog, federal supervisor response to employee work injury, fers disability application supervisor comments, FERS disability retirement, how good is to have the agency's supporting your federal disability claim?, informing the agency about your fers disability application, injured at work and still owcp refused, law firm representing clients in opm disability law all across america, letting the agency know about your opm disability application, nationwide representation of federal employees, notifying the Agency, OPM disability retirement, opm guidelines for disability retirement, owcp disability retirement, postal service disability retirement, resources for injured federal workers, supervisors and disabled employees in the US federal agencies, tendencies among federal disability retirement actors, the agency's natural reactions to your application for federal medical retirement, the disabled federal employee and the minimal cooperation from the agency, uncooperation from the agency with opm disability paperwork, unfair agency's actions against light duty workers, usps disability blog, USPS disability retirement, USPS disability retirement benefits, what should you expect from the post office when faced with an opm claim, when supervisors show empathy and sensitivity, when the disabled federal worker gets the support she needs from agency, years in workers comp and still unable to work | Leave a comment »