All three are nouns; they begin from an implication of a factual posit within an objective world, and slowly move towards the purely subjective universe with a human being’s psyche; and all three imply an encounter between the subjective and the objective, or between a person and the greater world.
The first refers to a state of being — of some conscious being acting in a manner which implies a lack of something; the second, an action implying a thought process within the acting individual; and the third, an emotion, a foreboding, a thought process of haunting causal consequences. It is the encounter between the subjective and the objective which results in a lack of certainty, a state of being resulting in an action that robs the actor of confidence in moving forward, and a feeling that something is not quite right.
A Federal or Postal employee who suffers from a medical condition may experience all three nouns — of uncertainty for the future; of hesitation in knowing what to do; of trepidation in determining one’s future.
For Federal employees and U.S. Postal workers who suffer from a medical condition such that the medical condition prevents the Federal or Postal employee from performing one or more of the essential elements of one’s Federal or Postal job, consult with an Federal Disability Attorney who specializes in Federal Disability Retirement Law and get rid of the uncertainty, wipe away the hesitation and set aside the trepidation concerning the entire process of filing for Federal Disability Retirement benefits.
It is, in the end, lack of knowledge which results in uncertainty, hesitation and trepidation. Replace such nouns with certainty, confidence and action by seeking the counsel of a Federal Disability Retirement Lawyer today.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill, Esquire
Filed under: Pre-Application Considerations | Tagged: border patrol officer with long term injuries and health issues, border patrol schedule of award and disability retirement, cbp gov medical retirement attorney, civilian medical retirement, dol long term stress case, federal employee sleeping on duty apnea, federal gov employee’s response letter to notice of proposed separation medical, federal standard form for release limited duty employee due to lack of work, federal technician medical retirement, fers disability retirement application, filing a workers compensation medical retirement opm after leaving government? you got only one year after separation (call atty for a free first time consultation), filing a workers compensation or opm disability after leaving government (you got only one year after separation: call atty for free first time consultation), handicapped border patrol agent, legal assistance doctor statements for disability, medical conditions impacting performance for government employees, notice of proposed separation-medical from federal government employment, opm applying for disability retirement after separation – it’s possible if within one year after separation (you have a one shot only so make sure to have professional help if possible), opm disability blog, opm disability medical records required, opm disability retirement package case order, opm when are medical records required? during the application (select the best documentation only), opm workmans comp procedures to initiate disability retirement, physicians guide to writing fers disability report, reasons for medical retirement (search opm accepted medical disabilities in this blog), removal for medical disability approval and paying when lwop started, resignation from federal employment after fitness for duty, rural postal workers comp, second opinion orthopedic evaluation for owcp plan b, unfair proposal to remove disabled employee from federal service, us government civilian disability lawyer, USPS Disability, waiting on civil service disability, what if I medically retire as a federal technician, what qualifies as handicapped in faa? It depends on your job and conditions call atty for free consultation for new customers, when opm demands retirement to injured employees (usually they just want to fire them for other reasons or medically separate them without retirement benefits) | Leave a comment »