They are two different tools or implements; of the latter, a connotation not of the tool itself, but the approach to take. In grammar (do we even teach that in schools, anymore?), the term “implement” can be either a noun or a verb. As a noun, it is a tool, utensil or other piece of equipment. As a verb, it means to act upon a decision made or plan devised. In either meaning, it is the application of X upon Y, as a tool to use or a decision to move forward upon.
As to the specific tools — the hammer or the screwdriver — the application of either depends upon the work to be done. As metaphors, they denote differing approaches. The way of the hammer is to pound whatever it is which needs to be driven in; the approach of the screwdriver is to slowly and methodically twist and turn the screw until it attaches and secures the two or more surfaces which previously remained separate and apart. The manner and approach between the two differ considerably, but both in their completion manage to do the job required.
In Law, the two approaches require thought and planning. The “hammer” approach, of pounding the law aggressively; the “screwdriver” way, of a quieter, more persuasive tone. The choice between the two depends upon the circumstance, the audience, the goal and the plan. For Federal Disability Retirement applicants, the manner and approach of applying the law is important. What you say; how you say it; the hammer approach or the screwdriver manner — that is the province of an experienced lawyer.
Contact a FERS attorney who specializes in Federal Disability Retirement Law, and consider whether in preparing, formulating and filing an effective Federal or Postal Disability Retirement application under the Federal Employees’ Retirement System (FERS) with the U.S. Office of Personnel Management, you should use the hammer approach, or the screwdriver methodology.
Sincerely,
Robert R. McGill
Lawyer exclusively representing Federal and Postal employees to secure their Federal Disability Retirement benefits under FERS from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.
Filed under: Reflections of an OPM Disability Retirement Lawyer | Tagged: alleged misconduct to make you sign that resignation letter with the postal service, am i allowed to work while waiting for opm medical retirement decision, attendance performance and conduct problems for stress or depression in the federal government workplace, attorneys work with postal injured employees los angeles, burnout in federal government medical illness, california los angeles area injured postal employee attorney, can i work while awaiting a worker's comp decision, disabled veteran benefits and owcp offset questions to opm medical retirement attorney, disciplinary actions for excessive absences medical reasons, dol 2nd opinion dr is to recommend permanent medical retirement or to get me back to work?, dol partial disability benefits, experienced attorney owcp long term disabilities federal employment, federal disability application and lwop status, federal employee with disabling conditions, federal employee with multiple herniated disks in neck and back planning to file for medical retirement, federal employment and resignation letters which you’ll regret signing for walking out empty handed, harassment on postal employees under workers comp, hiring a knowledgably attorney to take care of your fers disability claim, how to fill out form 3112 forms when medical condition is fatigue and sleeping problems, life after postal disability retirement, medical impairment resignation for federal service lawyer, medical resignation from federal employment, mspb medical discrimination in puerto rico, opm employee filing for workman's comp medical retirement, opm excessive absences discipline lawyer, opm light duty policy and if deny options, owcp case management contact, performance improvement plan scheme in government sector terminating disabled federal employees, plantar fasciitis owcp disability retirement case, postal disability doctors letters guide lines, postal disability retirement help, postal removal against usps light duty employee, postal service and light duty fers attorney, postal service light duty policies, postal service medical termination proposal attorney, proposed removal due to excessive absences for medical grounds federal government employment, retiring from the post office early due to disability cers, sf 3107 instructions for immediate physical limitations retirement, stress leave and usps attorney, usps disability retirement approval, usps health insurance after disability retirement as part of a postal employee benefit, usps long term disability insurance attorney, usps medical retirement lawyer, usps removal while on owcp, what a fers disability lawyer advice would be about signing ps form 50, when owcp limited duty and no available work seek expert legal advice, when there is no light duty for letter or rural carriers at post office, why to hire an attorney to help you with your opm medical retirement application, workers comp case close and denial of benefits | Leave a comment »